Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dale Duncan's avatar

I don’t think you were wrong when you said the Colts had the upper hand. I think Irsay and Ballard managed this whole thing pretty well. Two things may have changed an argued for an immediate payoff to JT: 1. The play of Richardson. His dramatic start to the season probably made the case to add a warrior — a happy one — as a possible; and 2. They were convinced in recent days he’s 100% healthy and will shift into beast mode if they feed him now. I would add that the compensation places him in the appropriate place in the pecking order of premier backs so they didn’t have to overpay. Now they know what they have left to work with as they add pieces throughout AR’s rookie contract.

Expand full comment
CW's avatar

The reason it didn’t happen 2 months ago? He hadn’t demonstrated the ankle was good. He wouldn’t practice. Now that he’s demonstrated that he’s healthy, albeit behind the scenes, the extension gets done. No big mystery there.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts