6 Comments
User's avatar
Ron Beilke's avatar

I completely agree, though I'm not sure I see any way around inheritance taxes. I wondered if Jim left instructions with his daughters regarding what he'd like done with the collection? I'm thinking about a wing at the Indpls Musum of Art.

Chas's avatar

To see the collection was a moment in time we got to enjoy. Nothing is forever.

JN's avatar

I envy those with the ability to look at things in this way. My sentimentality causes me such sorrow sometimes.

IndyJeffrey's avatar

"...but with deep reflection and love for the legacy he built." << is exactly why you wouldn't sell it. Or at least sell the entire collection to someone who would share it with the world.

In all fairness, I collect this and that. My family would/will sell what they can the minute I pass away.

The daughters should have just issued this statement: "These things don't mean anything to us. So we'll sell them to anyone who wants them." THAT is honesty.

JN's avatar

I feel like the tax issue is a bit of a cop out given the family's vast wealth. Though I don't begrudge them for doing what they feel is right for them, but I, too, am saddened, as a collector myself. I hope they keep at least a few items that they connect with in some way to remember their dad by. I cherish several items that belonged to my late father.

Bradford Boyd's avatar

I was hoping the City of Carmel might entice the Irsay family into building a museum for all his artifacts next to the proposed Great American Songbook Museum.